One of the most effective, yet illegitimate ways to
marginalize the position of your opponent is to set up a straw man of your
opponent, and to universally characterize that opponent with your shoddy misrepresentation
of him. This seems to have become one
of the most effective ways that people have taken to discourse in recent years
in order to discredit the ministries of the straw man that has become known as
the “angry, ranting fundamentalists.”
Now, to be clear, let’s make two simple admissions from the get-go.
Admission #1: There
is such a thing as an angry, ranting fundamentalist. We all know what he
looks like, don’t we? He cares more
about externals than internals. He
spends more time on divisiveness than doctrine. He exhibits little to no grace
in his interactions with others. He’ll
gladly compromise exegetical integrity and hermeneutical accuracy in order to
get his point across. His lines of separation
fall quickly along the debatable paths of music, dress, bible versions,
etc. This is the guy that we’re all familiar with, because he comes to our mind
immediately when we consider the distasteful subculture that lurks beneath the
surface of the network of angry, ranting fundamentalists.
Admission #2: Nobody
wants to be characterized as an angry, ranting fundamentalist. Even those whose opinions on doctrine and
deportment line up very closely with the movement known as fundamentalism want
little to do with the title, because a straw man looms in the forefront,
blocking the way to any legitimate claim to the label. This is understandable. In fact, it’s more than understandable. It may even be better understood to be
embraceable. It’s high time, anyways,
that we consider allegiances to Christ to be more important than allegiances to
labels. In that way, perhaps the straw
man known as the “angry, ranting fundamentalist” has been a service to the church.
So where am I going with this? Not long ago, a friend of
mine sent out a series of tweets that really got me thinking. In those tweets, he accurately exposed the
ironic similarities between angry, ranting fundamentalists, and those who try
so desperately to distance themselves from them. His comments challenged and convicted me, and
so I’ve expanded on them with one simple purpose. I want you to think and ask
yourself this question: In your noble, admirable pursuit to distance yourself
from the straw man of the angry, ranting fundamentalist, is it possible that
you’re acting just like an angry, ranting fundamentalist?
Here are at least eleven ways that you could know. If there are more, don’t shy away from
passing them along to me and I’ll add them to the list.
If
all you can seem to focus on is angry, ranting fundamentalists, then you just
might be acting like an angry, ranting fundamentalist.
If you find it necessary to publish your
views so that others can take sides with you or against you, then you are
adopting the time-tested strategy of an angry, ranting fundamentalist.
If
you resort to anger and ranting against angry, ranting fundamentalists, then
you just might be acting like an angry, ranting fundamentalist.
If
you find it necessary to impose your views on a text in order to make a point
about angry, ranting fundamentalists, then you just might be acting like an
angry, ranting fundamentalist.
If
all of the issues in your mind that place you at odds with angry, ranting
fundamentalists are viewed through a black and white spectrum, then you just
might be acting like an angry, ranting fundamentalist.
If
you adopt an “us vs. them” mindset about angry, ranting fundamentalists, then
you just might be acting like an angry, ranting fundamentalist.
If
the issues that place you at odds with the angry, ranting fundamentalists find
more place in your preaching than in the preaching of angry, ranting
fundamentalists, then you just might be acting like an angry, ranting
fundamentalist.
If
your discoveries related to biblical truth and Christian liberty cause you to
think that you are better than the angry, ranting fundamentalists, then you
just might be acting like an angry, ranting fundamentalist.
If
you feel the need to shame others into adopting your beliefs about angry,
ranting fundamentalists, then you just might be acting like an angry, ranting
fundamentalist.
If
your posture towards angry, ranting fundamentalists is one that finds no love
and appreciation for any part of the ministry of an angry, ranting
fundamentalist, then you just might be acting like an angry, ranting
fundamentalist.
If you’re quick to separate from, and slow to
reconcile with an angry, ranting fundamentalist, then you just might be acting
like an angry, ranting fundamentalist.